How to Select Prefer Reviewers for a Journal

The practice of suggesting peer reviewers by authors for their work is controversial. Peer review is a cardinal part of the academic publishing process. Unremarkably, qualified experts review submitted articles to cheque their quality and match for the journals. Commonly, editors of the peer-reviewed journals choose these experts. The reviewer's identity tin can be bearding or disclosed depending on the periodical's policies.

Often journals require authors to suggest reviewers during the manuscript submission procedure. Potential reviewers are independent experts in your field of research. Nonetheless, this practice tin sometimes cause controversies and put authors in an ethical quandary.

Dos and Don'ts of Suggesting Reviewers

When you suggest peer reviewers for your work, you should stay unbiased. As scholars have noted, "An author-suggested peer reviewer choice might also tempt authors to seek experts who might be more receptive or sympathetic to the authors' message or results, and thus favor the outcome of that newspaper." Merely you should try non to fall into this trap.

Follow these tips to cull potential reviewers in an ethical way:

• Practise explore the research field to notice scholars who might want to review your work.
• Practise give a diverse list of reviewers from different institutions, in dissimilar related fields, and with different points of view.
• Exercise ensure that your recommendations are experts in your field.
• DO accept your time and exist thorough when yous make suggestions. Your reference list tin can exist a starting signal.
• DON'T propose experts whom you know personally.
• DON'T list potential reviewers who work for your target journal.
• DON'T suggest reviewers considering they will hold with your piece of work.
• DON'T suggest reviewers who piece of work at the same institution as you practise.
• DON'T have all the reviewers from the same country. It is important to take a global perspective.

Above all, DO follow the journal'due south guidelines for suggesting experts for your manuscript. Some journals practise provide a list of requests for author suggestions (see this case from Free energy & Fuels).

Related: Finished picking reviewers for your research paper? Read this commodity to learn more nigh how to reply to referee comments!

Pros and Cons of Author-Suggested Peer Reviewing

Why is author-suggested peer reviewing so controversial? Because even the most honest authors might suggest readers who will view their work favorably. At worst, it may open up the door to fake peer review. In addition, the editor of a peer-reviewed journal may not disclose to the authors, the reviewers he or she has chosen.  However, the reviewers nevertheless know that the author suggested them. This can influence the reviewer's decision.

Research supports the problems with author-suggested peer review. Lutz Bornmann and Hans-Dieter Daniel published an commodity. They asked, "Do author-suggested reviewers rate submissions more favorably than editor-suggested reviewers?" The results were clear.  Editor-suggested reviewers rated manuscripts between 30% and 42% less favorably than writer-suggested reviewers did, indicating that author-suggested reviewers requite better reviews.

Though writer-suggested reviewing has some ethical bug, it has some advantages too. Suggesting your own readers might help your piece of work find a dwelling. Today, research fields are very circuitous. Every field has endless sub-fields. No one is an proficient in every sub-field. So authors might know better how to choose experts in their sub-fields.

Moreover, author-suggested reviews allow editors to focus on other tasks in the publication process. For some journals, assigning peer reviewers means a huge time commitment, which tin divert periodical'southward resources, affecting quality. Though some people would disagree with this indicate, it is i potential argument for writer-suggested peer reviews.

Share Your Experience

The peer review process is getting more than complex every day. Have y'all been asked to propose peer reviewers for your own commodity? How did you handle the situation? Did you discover it ethically questionable? What is your opinion of the writer-suggested peer review process? Write to us in the comments to let usa know!

Enago University, the noesis arm of Enago, offers comprehensive and up-to-date resources on academic research and scholarly publishing to all levels of scholarly professionals: students, researchers, editors, publishers, and bookish societies. Information technology is likewise a popular platform for networking, allowing researchers to acquire, share, and talk over their experiences within their network and community. The team, which comprises subject field matter experts, academicians, trainers, and technical project managers, are passionate about helping researchers at all levels establish a successful career, both within and outside academia.

Sign-up to read more than

Subscribe for free to go unrestricted access to all our resources on inquiry writing and bookish publishing including:

• 2000+ web log articles
• 50+ Webinars
• 10+ Expert podcasts
• l+ Infographics

• Q&A Forum
• x+ eBooks
• 10+ Checklists
• Research Guides

Please enter a valid personal electronic mail By clicking this checkbox yous consent to receiving newsletters from Enago University. Y'all can unsubscribe at any time by clicking on the unsubscribe link in the newsletter. Learn more than about our Privacy Policy.

We hate spam besides. We hope to protect your privacy and never spam you.

liraarprot77.blogspot.com

Source: https://www.enago.com/academy/suggest-reviewers-paper/

Share this post